We have Voles - Brisbane's tunnels
Ok, I've accepted that we're getting a tunnel under the river - I'm never going through it, but it'll be there. But some of the other parts of the TransApex plan are a little odd, at least as I understand it.
TransApex is a proposed network of five tolled road tunnels, including three river crossings, linking inner-suburbs of Brisbane. If you check out this pdf and scroll through to the appendix's there is a map of the proposed works. Basically there is more stuff to get people to the airport, a tunnel under the Storey Bridge, a tunnel from Dutton park to St Lucia and a bridge from West End/South Brisbane to Hale Street/Milton Road across Corro Drive.
The argument for the project is that by 2016, Brisbane will 450,000 more people leading to 40% increase in vehicle travel and a 400% increase in congestion delay. The current statistic is that 43% of traffic in the CBD is through traffic and most jobs are located in the CBD & Urban Fringe. The plan is that the council will pay 4bn, the state and feds will contribute 1bn and we'll pay 3bn through user pays. In the Courier Mail, 18/3/5, an article ran (with a great map) stating that the project faces a 1.2 bn blowout and that the bridge between West End and Hale St will probably be dropped, and this is before any work is even done.
The bit that is going to go through first is the North South Bypass Tunnel and it does make some sense. It's just that I have some issues with the base assumptions at the heart of all this - there is no questioning in the first place of the necessity of growth in Queensland, either at Federal or local level. It's like we have no choice and yet it's the current gov'ts that are approving the developments of more and more town houses in the inner city and development projects in the burbs. And that basic assumption has impacts on everything from water consumption and electricity (which affects our climate) through to public transport and schooling. I get that. I also see that these decisions seem to not even be on the agenda for discussion in the first place.
It also seems to be focussed on getting people into the city - now most of these people only work there. It's rush in and then rush out. This is fine and good - we're supposed to have lives outside of our worklife. But it also means that we could find public transport solutions that would bring the people to where they need to be. Now I want a free service between the valley and southbank via the city. And we could have better park and ride services with reinstatement of the buslanes but the assumption, again is that growth is good and that we must each and everyone of us have a car, or two.
I had a scout around for links to people who are discussing this, but as with most of the government proposals there is little actual community involvement in the discussion - yes business, no community. If anyone can point me towards any groups working on these issues, I'd love to link them here.
For more information on the Council's plans go here.
TransApex is a proposed network of five tolled road tunnels, including three river crossings, linking inner-suburbs of Brisbane. If you check out this pdf and scroll through to the appendix's there is a map of the proposed works. Basically there is more stuff to get people to the airport, a tunnel under the Storey Bridge, a tunnel from Dutton park to St Lucia and a bridge from West End/South Brisbane to Hale Street/Milton Road across Corro Drive.
The argument for the project is that by 2016, Brisbane will 450,000 more people leading to 40% increase in vehicle travel and a 400% increase in congestion delay. The current statistic is that 43% of traffic in the CBD is through traffic and most jobs are located in the CBD & Urban Fringe. The plan is that the council will pay 4bn, the state and feds will contribute 1bn and we'll pay 3bn through user pays. In the Courier Mail, 18/3/5, an article ran (with a great map) stating that the project faces a 1.2 bn blowout and that the bridge between West End and Hale St will probably be dropped, and this is before any work is even done.
The bit that is going to go through first is the North South Bypass Tunnel and it does make some sense. It's just that I have some issues with the base assumptions at the heart of all this - there is no questioning in the first place of the necessity of growth in Queensland, either at Federal or local level. It's like we have no choice and yet it's the current gov'ts that are approving the developments of more and more town houses in the inner city and development projects in the burbs. And that basic assumption has impacts on everything from water consumption and electricity (which affects our climate) through to public transport and schooling. I get that. I also see that these decisions seem to not even be on the agenda for discussion in the first place.
It also seems to be focussed on getting people into the city - now most of these people only work there. It's rush in and then rush out. This is fine and good - we're supposed to have lives outside of our worklife. But it also means that we could find public transport solutions that would bring the people to where they need to be. Now I want a free service between the valley and southbank via the city. And we could have better park and ride services with reinstatement of the buslanes but the assumption, again is that growth is good and that we must each and everyone of us have a car, or two.
I had a scout around for links to people who are discussing this, but as with most of the government proposals there is little actual community involvement in the discussion - yes business, no community. If anyone can point me towards any groups working on these issues, I'd love to link them here.
For more information on the Council's plans go here.
